RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rituximab (RTX), anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies, has been approved for many rheumatic and autoimmune diseases, the use of RTX is still limited due to financial constrain. Biosimilar RTX may increase access by offering patients a more affordable option, lead to improved patient outcomes. However, real-world data related to its immediate and short-term safety is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world immediate and short-term safety profiles of CT-P10, a biosimilar of Rituximab, in patients with rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. METHODS: This prospective study included patients diagnosed with rheumatic or autoimmune diseases, aged ≥ 18 years, who were treated with biosimilar RTX at Siriraj or Ramathibodi Hospital during February 2019 to May 2019. Patients were followed up through 6 months after the infusions. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients, with 124 infusions, 84% were females with mean age (SD) of 49.4 (15.7) years. The most common rheumatic and autoimmune disease included in this study was systemic lupus erythematosus (26%). All immediate adverse events (AEs) (15 out of 124 infusions) were mild requiring only symptomatic and supportive treatment. Short-term AEs included infection (N = 35), hematologic abnormalities (N = 33), chylous ascites (N = 1), and others (N = 10). Two deaths were related to serious bacterial and viral infection. Hematologic AEs comprised anemia (N = 5), neutropenia (N = 10), lymphopenia (N = 15), and thrombocytopenia (N = 3). CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, biosimilar RTX (CT-P10) has favorable immediate and short-term safety profiles. However, further studies with large sample size and long-term follow-up in real-world practice are still required to confirm the result.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX), an antiB cell monoclonal antibody, on lung and skin involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: All literature published in Embase and Medline before September 2019 were comprehensively searched. Two independent reviewers selected eligible studies, extracted relevant data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. We only considered randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies that compared RTX with a placebo, other immunosuppressive agents, or corticosteroids. All analyses were performed using RevMan (version 5.3). RESULTS: A total of 8 studies (3 RCTs and 5 cohort studies) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed a significant improvement of modified Rodnan skin score in the RTX group only in the cohort studies (mean difference [SD] - 3.31 [- 4.95, - 1.68]; I2 = 82%). As to the PFT, the RTX group showed a significant improvement in the forced vital capacity only in 3 RCTs (mean difference [SD] 6.59 [3.51, 9.68]; I2 = 0%). Additionally, the RTX group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the diffuse capacity of carbon monoxide only in the cohort studies (mean difference [SD] 7.42 [1.08, 13.76]; I2 = 97%). There were no significant differences in the AEs of the RTX and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: RTX may be effective for lung and skin involvement in SSc, with no serious AEs. However, further studies with high quality and a large sample size are necessary to firmly establish the efficacy and safety of the use of RTX with SSc patients. Key Points ⢠RTX may be an alternative treatment for cutaneous and pulmonary manifestations in patients with SSc with a favorable safety profile. ⢠However, further studies with a high quality and large sample size are necessary to firmly establish its efficacy and safety.
